The Painfully Pointless War on Weed

American Society, Economy, Feature, Government/Politics, Science, State and Local, The Courts

The Painfully Pointless War on Weed

No Comments 23 November 2009

Courtesy Alternet:

You might remember Robert McNamara’s stunning mea culpa, delivered a quarter century after his Vietnam War policies sent some 50,000 Americans (and even more horrendous numbers of Vietnamese) to their deaths in that disastrous war. In his 1995 memoir, the man who had been a cold, calculating secretary of defense for both Kennedy and Johnson belatedly confessed that he and other top officials had long known that the war was an unwinnable, ideologically driven mistake. “We were wrong,” he wrote, almost tearfully begging in print for public forgiveness. “We were terribly wrong.”

Yes, they were, and so are today’s leaders (from the White House to nearly all local governments), who are keeping us mired in the longest, most costly, and most futile war in U.S. history: the drug war. As one adamant opponent of this ongoing madness put it, “I cannot help but wonder how many more lives, and how much more money, will be wasted before another Robert McNamara admits what is plain for all to see: the War on Drugs is a failure. Americans are paying too high a price in lives and liberty for a failing War on Drugs, about which our leaders have lost all sense of proportion.”

That was no ex-hippie stoner expressing himself through a haze of herbal smoke. It was America’s “Uncle Walter,” the journalistic icon Walter Cronkite, calling earlier this year for a new truthfulness and sanity in American drug policy.

The drug war is rife with major failures and absurdities, including the rise of a vast, murderous narco-state within Mexico, caused by U.S. consumer demand for drugs outlawed by our government; Plan Colombia, a secretive, multibillion-dollar U.S. military operation started by Bill Clinton in 2000 to eradicate coca production in that country, which now produces 15% more coca than it did before the plan was launched; the racist and grossly unjust sentencing disparity, established by lawmakers in the 1980s, between crack-cocaine users (mostly black) and powder snorters (mostly white); and the ridiculous refusal by pious federal authorities to allow our farmers to grow hemp–a useful, profitable, sustainable, and historic crop (see Lowdown, May 1999).

Here we focus on one particular piece of policy insanity that has afflicted our country for nearly 100 years and was foisted on us by political demagogues, power-hungry police agencies, fire-breathing preachers, fear-mongering media moguls, self-appointed moralists, and other forces of ignorance and arrogance. Thanks to them, America is mired in–get this–a war on a weed. Marijuana is the foe, and after a century of battle, the weed is winning!

A painful price

-Article continues at Source.

Minnesota Supreme Court Declares Al Franken Winner

Congress, Feature, Government/Politics, The Courts

Minnesota Supreme Court Declares Al Franken Winner

No Comments 30 June 2009

MINNEAPOLIS (Reuters) – The Minnesota Supreme Court on Tuesday declared Democrat Al Franken the winner of a tight U.S. Senate race over Republican Norm Coleman, which should give Democrats the 60-seat majority they need to overcome procedural obstacles and push through their agenda.

Coleman has said in published reports he is unlikely to appeal the state court’s decision to the federal courts. Under state law, the court’s decision gives Franken the right to occupy the seat, which has been up for grabs since last November’s election.

Minnesota Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty has said he will certify the election winner based on what the state court decides.

Read the rest of this article here.

Congratulations, Senator Franken!

Tapes Reveal Nixon’s View of Abortion

American Society, Government/Politics, Odds and Ends, The Courts

Tapes Reveal Nixon’s View of Abortion

No Comments 23 June 2009

NY Times

Published: June 23, 2009

WASHINGTON — On Jan. 23, 1973, when the Supreme Court struck down state criminal abortion laws in Roe v. Wade, President Richard M. Nixon made no public statement. But privately, newly released tapes reveal, he expressed ambivalence.

Nixon worried that greater access to abortions would foster “permissiveness,” and said that “it breaks the family.” But he also saw a need for abortion in some cases, such as interracial pregnancies.

“There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white,” he told an aide, before adding: “Or a rape.”  Source Article

Inhofe: I Made Up My Mind To Vote Against Sotomayor’s Supreme Court Nomination 11 Years Ago

Congress, Government/Politics, The Courts

Inhofe: I Made Up My Mind To Vote Against Sotomayor’s Supreme Court Nomination 11 Years Ago

No Comments 18 June 2009

Think Progress

By Ian Millhiser June 18, 2009 at 2:30 pm

In a surprisingly candid statement, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) admitted that his vote to oppose Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor was a “foregone conclusion” eleven years before she was even nominated:

“That was a foregone conclusion,” the Oklahoma Republican said, citing his 1998 opposition to Sotomayor’s nomination to her current post.

Source Article

Twelve Angry White People: Jury Nullification in a Pennsylvania Coal Town

Coal, Environment, The Courts

Twelve Angry White People: Jury Nullification in a Pennsylvania Coal Town

No Comments 18 June 2009

by Brasch

www.opednews.com

June 18, 2009 at 15:02:00

by Walter Brasch

The Schuylkill County, Pa., justice system managed to do something that insurance actuaries do with mixed results—it has determined not only the penalty for threats to a human life, but also the value of a human life.

● Norman E. Nickle, 54, who lived in Pottsville, the county seat, was sentenced in April to two life terms, without possibility of parole after he pled no contest to killing two teens the previous year. Nickle’s only defense was that he was high on drugs and alcohol at the time of the murders. Source Article

Here's How An Appellate Court Cheated Don Siegelman

Government/Politics, Odds and Ends, State and Local, The Courts

Here's How An Appellate Court Cheated Don Siegelman

No Comments 17 June 2009

by Roger Shuler

www.opednews.com
June 16, 2009 at 23:32:12

Cross Posted at Legal Schnauzer

We are starting to see the fallout from the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that upheld most of the convictions against former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman and codefendant Richard Scrushy.

In the wake of that ruling, federal prosecutors asked that Siegelman be given a 20-year prison sentence, almost three times his original sentence of seven years. Then the full 11th Circuit denied an en banc review, essentially putting its stamp of approval on the earlier findings by a three-judge panel.

Given the possibly drastic repercussions of the appellate ruling, we should ask this question: Did the 11th Circuit get it right, under the law?

The answer, on multiple grounds, is a resounding no. And our review indicates that the same politics that permeated the Siegelman case at the trial level also infected the appellate process.  Source Article

Justices Tell Judges Not to Rule on Major Backers

Coal, The Courts

Justices Tell Judges Not to Rule on Major Backers

No Comments 08 June 2009

NY Times

Published: June 8, 2009

WASHINGTON — Elected judges must disqualify themselves from cases involving people who spent exceptionally large sums to put them on the bench, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday in a 5-to-4 decision.

The decision, the first to say the Constitution’s due process clause has a role to play in policing the role of money in judicial elections, ordered the chief justice of the West Virginia Supreme Court to recuse himself from a $50 million case against a coal company whose chief executive had spent $3 million to elect him.  Source Article

INSTANT VIEW: U.S. top court justice grants Chrysler sale delay

Economy, Labor, The Banks, The Courts

INSTANT VIEW: U.S. top court justice grants Chrysler sale delay

No Comments 08 June 2009

Mon Jun 8, 2009 4:52pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A U.S. Supreme Court justice on Monday granted a request to put on hold the sale of bankrupt automaker Chrysler LLC to a group led by Italian carmaker Fiat SpA.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in a one-sentence order, said the orders of the bankruptcy judge allowing the sale “are stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the court.”

The Chrysler case could set a precedent for General Motors Corp, which is using a similar quick-sale strategy in its bankruptcy in New York.

Indiana pension funds and consumer groups had asked the Supreme Court on Sunday to stop the sale of Chrysler to Fiat while they challenge the deal.  Source Article

If I understand this correctly, these bondholders want their money or they force liquidation. Isn’t that called EXTORTION??

Just asking……

~Susan~

Appeals Court Declines to Hear Siegelman Case

Government/Politics, State and Local, The Courts

Appeals Court Declines to Hear Siegelman Case

No Comments 15 May 2009

Former AL Governor Don Siegelman appears to be headed back to Jail now that the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has declined to hear his appeal:

“[Siegelman] goes back for re-sentencing now. It will be difficult for him to stay out of jail because it is unlikely that the Supreme Court will hear this case,” Horton said.

Courtesy Rawstory.

Mr. Justice Gore

Feature, Government/Politics, The Courts

Mr. Justice Gore

No Comments 04 May 2009

The New Yorker

Hendrik Hertzberg

May 4, 2009

Mr. Justice Gore

“The choice would be electrifying,” writes Michael Sean Winters at “In All Things,” the group blog of America, the Catholic (Jesuit) weekly.

The biggest objection to putting Al Gore on the Supreme Court, I assume, would be that he’s not a lawyer. But is this really a bug rather than a feature? Gore spent sixteen years in Congress, where he helped make the laws, and eight as Vice-President, where he took care that the laws were faithfully executed. His perspective would fill some giant blind spots on the present Court, which is made up entirely of former federal appeals-court judges who have little or no political experience, have never been elected to anything, and have a strikingly narrow experience of life in general.  Source Article

Our Monthly Target

  • 138% funded
  • $3460 cleared
  • $0 pending
  • $3460 / $2500 total

Support the H.O.R.N.

Your support keeps us on the air!
Without you, there is no conversation.

Listen Live

Listen Live! Test drive our new JAVA player. Win/Mac/Lin
Log in with

Who’s Chatting

© 2012 The Head On Radio Network | America's Liberal Voice!. Powered by Wordpress.

Daily Edition Theme by WooThemes - Premium Wordpress Themes