
Much ado has been made about criticism directed at President Obama’s speech to school kids earlier this week, and the evil liberal investigation into President George H.W. Bush’s speech to school kids in 1991. Plenty of articles make reference to the investigation, but none of them link to it, as if there was something to hide. Since The Head On Radio Network only deals in reality, we found it, and we’re linking to it. Here’s what actually happened.
President Bush’s speech occurred on October 1, 1991. On October 2nd, The Washington Post printed an article (scroll down to the headline “TV Technique 101 With George Bush”), which accused the Bush White House of improprieties, by using Department of Education funds to pay for the privatized production of the televised speech. Imagine that – a mainstream corporate-owned media outlet flinging allegations of improper activity. According to Fox News, the Obama administration is illegal from the word “Go”, but I disgress.
Democratic Congressman William D. Ford of Michigan, was chairman of the House Committee on Education and Labor. Lamar Alexander, Bush’s Secretary of Education, and now-republican Senator from Tennessee, was invited to come before Ford’s committee to discuss the allegations. As reported, this is true. The Office of The President of The United States had been accused of seemingly illegal activity – not by the Democrats in Congress, but by the media.
This, however, is where the evil liberal conspiracy ends.
Chairman Ford in his opening statement declared: “And I say this to indicate to you that I fully expected on the basis of preliminary information I had and the preliminary study that our people did that they would find a legal justification for what was done, and I can’t understand why the people at the White House didn’t understand the importance of having the GAO make that kind of report here with or before your appearance in the committee.” He further added: “I want you to know that we are not trying to hold back, and that I personally expect that at some stage the GAO will tell us that the transfer of funds was legal.”
What?! You mean the evil Democrats had already looked into the matter, found nothing illegal, and expected the Bush White House to agree?? Oh, my! That’s a terrible conspiracy! It looks as though the Democrats were now attempting to CLEAR the Bush White House of any wrong-doing by holding a hearing.
Committee member after committee member all stated the same thing. None of them found anything illegal. You can read the transcript of the hearing in pdf format here. It’s only 64 pages.
So, is that to say the Democrats had no objections to President Bush’s speech at all? No. They had but one objection to it. They objected to its production costs being paid for out of the Department of Education’s budget, rather than the White House’s own budget. The Democrats did not, however, approach this hearing with a preconceived notion that the Bush administration had done anything illegal. In fact, quite the opposite is true. They approached it with the preconceived CONCLUSION that the Bush administration had done nothing wrong, and that’s clearly reflected in the transcript.
No Democrats said Bush should have never given the speech. No Democrats said Bush had no business addressing America’s school kids. No Democrats ever promoted the wholesale preemptive censoring or banning of Bush’s speech. No Democrats ever advocated parents keeping their children home from school that day.
What was the final conclusion, then? The Bush White house had done nothing illegal, which is exactly what the Democrats had concluded, before the hearing ever convened. The media had falsely accused the republican President, and the Democratic-controlled Congress worked to clear his name. It really is as simple as that. We’ll see how long it takes the republicans to offer any reciprocity regarding the currently-sitting Democratic President.
That’s not to say that there isn’t a rather glaringly-humorous juxtaposition that the political party, which is historically noted for its deep slashes to education funding, would use an education budget to pay for a broadcast, to promote their agenda about a program they feel the government has no business being involved with in the first place.
Ironic? Yes. Illegal? No, and the Democrats made sure the media knew it. And now you do, too.
-Sue and the Ranting Keyboard