Archive for the 'Foreign' Category

Federal Letters Tell Students They’re Security Threats

By SCOTT SHANE, The New York Times

WASHINGTON — A German graduate student in oceanography at M.I.T. applied to the Transportation Security Administration for a new ID card allowing him to work around ships and docks.

What the student, Wilken-Jon von Appen, received in return was a letter that not only turned him down but added an ominous warning from John M. Busch, a security administration official: “I have determined that you pose a security threat.”

Similar letters have gone to 5,000 applicants across the country who have at least initially been turned down for a Transportation Worker Identification Credential, an ID card meant to guard against acts of terrorism, agency officials said Monday.

“I was pretty much speechless and quite intimidated,” said Mr. von Appen, whose research is supported by a $65,000-a-year grant from the National Science Foundation.

A British student at M.I.T. who was rejected, Sophie Clayton, 28, said that at first she was amused at what appeared to be a bureaucratic absurdity. But as she pondered the designation, Ms. Clayton said she grew worried. “The two words ‘security threat’ are now in the files next to my name, my photograph and my fingerprints,” she said.

Ellen Howe, a security agency spokeswoman, said she did not believe the denial letters would cause students any problems with visa renewal or airport security checks. They will even be able to enter secure ports and ships for their work as long as they are accompanied by someone with the new ID, Ms. Howe said. More

What planet is Ellen Howe living on? Elderly American citizens with no criminal record can’t even get past airport security, and they’ve not been labeled a security threat! These foreign students will be lucky to not end up in Gitmo! Geesh! -Sue

U.N. sees world climate change deal in 2009

Via Rawstory: 

MADRID (Reuters) - The world can reach a significant new climate change pact by the end of 2009 if current talks keep up their momentum, the head of the United Nations climate panel said on Sunday.

 

The United Nations began negotiations on a sweeping new pact in March after governments agreed last year to work out a treaty to succeed the Kyoto Protocol by the end of next year.

“If this momentum continues you will get an agreement that is not too full of compromises,” said Rajendra Pachauri, head of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change, during a seminar at the Asian Development Bank annual meeting in Madrid.

Without a deal to cap greenhouse gas emissions around 2015, then halve them by 2050, the world will face ever more droughts, heatwaves, floods and rising seas, according to the U.N. panel.

The United Nations hopes to go beyond Kyoto by getting all countries to agree to curbs on emissions of greenhouse gases that fuel global warming.Only 37 rich nations were bound to cut emissions under Kyoto. The United States, one of the world’s biggest polluters, refused to join the agreement.

The next talks, to be held in Germany in June, will address funding technology to mitigate climate change — a key demand from developing countries who say rich countries should foot much of the bill.

Getting the private sector on board with a well regulated carbon emissions trading system is key to long-term financing, according to delegates at the ADB seminar.

“Investors need some certainty they will get some return,” said Simon Brooks, vice president at the European Investment Bank.

 

PRESTIGE AND POLITICS 

 

 Article Continues @ Sourced Site.

 

How low will lake levels go?

Courtesy MLive

 West Michigan residents concerned about sinking Great Lakes water levels will get a chance to share their views this week when U.S. and Canadian officials studying the issue visit Muskegon.

 

The International Joint Commission, a U.S.-Canadian panel that advises the two nations on Great Lakes issues, is studying water levels in lakes Michigan, Huron, Superior and Erie. A committee working on the IJC’s International Upper Great Lakes Study will host a public hearing on lake levels Sunday, from 10 a.m. to noon, at Grand Valley State University’s Annis Water Resources Institute, 740 W. Shoreline.

 

“We want to hear lots of people come out and squawk at this public meeting,” said John Nevin, an IJC spokesman. “We want to hear what this issue means to people when the water is really high or really low.”

 

IJC officials might get an earful.

 

Lake Michigan’s water level has dropped nearly four feet since 1997, according to federal data. The low lake level has widened beaches but created safety hazards for recreational boaters and caused freighters to run aground in Muskegon, Grand Haven and other ports around the lake.

On the flip side, record-high lake levels in 1986 caused severe beach erosion that sent several Grand Haven cottages tumbling into the lake. 

 

The IJC study is focused on two issues: Whether dredging in the St. Clair River over the past century has caused excessive lowering of water levels in lakes Michigan and Huron; and if the volume of water flowing out of Lake Superior daily through control structures in the St. Marys River should be adjusted to account for below-average precipitation and global warming, which some studies suggest could lower lake levels by several feet over the next century.

 

The study could prompt changes, such as the construction of a water control structure in the St. Clair River, that would affect water levels in lakes Michigan and Huron, said Gene Stakhiv, co-chair of the International Upper Lakes Study Board.

 

“There are a whole range of changes in the regulation of flow and physical structures in the (Great Lakes) system that could help us control water levels,” Stakhiv said. “But we don’t know yet if there is a need for that.”

 

A growing chorus of critics — from scientists and shoreline property owners in Lake Huron’s Georgian Bay, to marina owners and shipping interests — want the U.S. and Canadian governments to plug what amounts to an unnaturally large drain hole in the St. Clair River. 

 

Article Continues @ Sourced Site

The End of Cheap Food?

From Washington Independent:           By MARY KANE 04/23/2008 

A sharp spike in prices for wheat, corn, rice and other staples has sparked riots in Mexico and Egypt, marches by hungry children in Yemen and the spectre of starving people in Haiti turning to mud pies for sustenance. This growing unrest is forcing the global community to focus on the causes of higher food costs and what can be done. But it’s also raising the troubling possibility that cheap prices for food may be gone for good, an economic relic of the the past. 

 

That scenario would be disastrous for the progress of fighting poverty in poor countries - and it would threaten to halt a long period of rising living standards in the United States tied directly to the inexpensive cost of food.

 

“Don’t look now, but the good times may have just stopped rolling,” the economist Paul Krugmanwrote in his New York Times column. The Economist was more strident: “The era of cheap food is over,” it declared. World Bank President Robert Zoellick, reaching back to policies created during the Great Depression for inspiration to address food inflation, is pushing a “New Deal” for global food policy, aimed at aiding impoverished countries with income support and help in producing crops.

 

The gloom-and-doom outlooks are prompted by rising prices for commodities, which started increasing steadily in 2001 before suddenly soaring recently. Wheat prices have gone up by 181 percent over the past three years, according to the World Bank; food prices around the globe have risen by 83 percent during the same period. In March, rice prices hit a 19-year high. Corn pricesrecently rose from $2.50 a bushel three years ago to $6, for the first time. Zoellick has predicted a sustained period of higher food costs, saying he expects prices to remain elevated through next year and stay above 2004 levels for at least the next seven years.

 

The causes are many. India and China have growing populations and are becoming more prosperous; more people can now afford to eat more meat, and the demand for animal feed has grown. In the U.S. and Europe, a boom in biofuel as alternative energy is diverting considerable amounts of corn from the market. A severe drought in Australia has contributed to a 25-year low in supplies. Some also blame speculation in the commodity markets for sharp swings in prices and availability.

 

While plenty of people are worried about the end of cheap food, it’s not clear yet whether that will happen, said David Orden, senior research fellow with the International Food Policy Research Institute. Things like the weak dollar becoming stronger, crop shortfalls easing, energy prices stabilizing and strong growth in the world economy are all factors that could affect the availability of food, he said, and no one’s sure how they will play out. “We just don’t know yet,” Orden said. “Before this bump in food prices started, people were not predicting it.”

 

What has become clear is that in a short time, soaring food costs have shaken some long-held assumptions about food and fuel, especially in the U.S.

 

Food has been cheap in America for nearly 60 years, and Americans set aside less of their incomes for food than any other country in the world, devoting just 11 percent of disposable income to it, compared to double that percentage in Europe. Keeping food costs low has been one of the great economic achievements of the last century. The low food costs, combined with rising incomes, “have been two of the primary sources of prosperity for American consumers,” said John Urbanchuck, an agriculture industry analyst for LECG, a global consulting firm.

 

Until now, Americans had the luxury of worrying about food due to its abundance. Concerns have centered on childhood obesity and an epidemic of diabetes. But new problems with food are already surfacing, as rising prices begin showing up at the grocery store. More expensive corn means people pay more for eggs and poultry, and still higher meat and milk prices are on the horizon. Record high oil prices are adding to price pressures, since transporting food costs more.

 

If prices stay high for a long time, the poor will be hit the hardest, since they spend the largest percentage of their incomes on food. Efforts to reduce hunger, like food stamps and free and reduced lunch programs, will become more costly, said Otto Doering, a professor of agricultural economics at Purdue University in Indiana. Asking taxpayers to pay more for them won’t exactly be politically popular, since food prices could also take a greater bite out of middle-class budgets. And paying more for food will mean having less to spend on things like big-screen television sets and iPods, putting a dent in the kind of consumer spending that has kept the economy growing for the past two decades.

 

 Article Continues @ Sourced Site.  

Oil price crosses 115 dollars for first time on supply jitters

From AFP via Rawstory:  

Oil prices streaked into new record territory for the second straight day Wednesday, boosted by a decline in US energy reserves and as the weakening dollar drew investments in commodities.

New York’s main oil futures contract, light sweet crude for delivery in May, crossed 115 dollars a barrel for the first time on its way to an intraday record high of 115.07. It settled up 1.14 dollars at a record close of 114.93 dollars.In London, Brent North Sea crude for June struck an intraday record high of 112.79 dollars a barrel before closing at a record 112.66 dollars, a gain of 1.08 dollars.

Both futures contracts had hit record highs Tuesday during trading and at the close as the market worried about tight supplies.

Those concerns were brought to the boil Wednesday by the weekly report from the US Department of Energy (DoE) that showed US energy stockpiles tumbled in the week ending April 11.US crude inventories slumped by 2.3 million barrels last week compared with analysts’ consensus forecast for a drop of 1.8 million.

US crude stocks now stand at 313.7 million barrels, in the lower half of the average range for this time of year, the department said.”The crude import data showed little sign of recovering after last week’s steep decline,” said Eric Wittenauer, an analyst at AG Edwards.

The DoE said that gasoline stocks fell by 5.5 million barrels, considerably more than market expectations for a fall of 1.8 million barrels, while distillate stocks such as heating fuel and diesel rose by 100,000 barrels, against predictions for a 1.5 million barrel decline.

 

Article Continues @ Sourced Site

Criminals of the world, unite and take over

From Salon:n “McMafia,” author Misha Glenny takes us on a startling tour of the new international underworld, documenting the hidden costs of an unregulated global free market.By Laura Miller

 Apr. 16, 2008 | In 2003, a joint operation of British intelligence, the Bulgarian police, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, Spanish police and the Bolivian Special Antitrafficking Force pulled off a bust that netted the largest amount of cocaine ever seized. The drug was hidden among blocks of medicinal clay destined for Madrid and also, authorities soon discovered, mixed into 770 boxes of powdered mashed potatoes set to be shipped to Varna, Bulgaria, via Chile. A couple of years earlier, a Colombian drug cartel (the source of the shipment) had smuggled a chemist into Bulgaria, where he trained Soviet-educated chemists to extract the coke from various seemingly innocuous substances.

 

For Misha Glenny, a journalist specializing in the Balkans and author of the new book “McMafia: A Journey Through the Global Criminal Underworld,” the smuggling operation was a prime example of what he calls the “internationalization of organized crime,” a phenomenon that has flourished over the past two decades. Estimates suggest that crime accounts for almost one-fifth of the planet’s gross domestic product, he reports, and “McMafia” is a sprawling, pell-mell tour of the world’s shadow economies, ranging from Russia to Israel to the Mideast, as well as India, Africa and Latin America. Glenny even makes it to western Canada, a seemingly mellow region that, due to the proliferating industry of marijuana cultivation, “is home to the largest per capita concentration of organized criminal syndicates in the world.”

 

Of course, there are criminal syndicates and then there are criminal syndicates. The mild-mannered British Columbian pot entrepreneurs (whose livelihood, Glenny makes it clear, ought to be legalized) seem a long way from the white hot centers of international gangland like Russia and Colombia. Alas, not far enough; one of the pot smugglers Glenny interviewed felt compelled to break with his longtime business partners when they opted to make a kilo-for-kilo trade with cocaine dealers in Florida — whose sources were no doubt some pretty scary people.

 

Nowadays, serious crime, like serious capitalism, requires globalization. Tony Soprano-style protection rackets are old news, and generally stop at national borders. But trading in contraband goods — be it drugs, arms, oil or human beings — inevitably means setting up international relationships and connections. Above all, the big-time criminal needs a way to launder his loot, and there has never been a global climate more obliging for bad men who want to make dirty money look clean.

 

The reasons for this outrageous blossoming of so many flowers of evil are, according to Glenny, essentially twofold. “The collapse of … the Soviet Union is the single most important event prompting the exponential growth of organized crime around the world in the past two decades,” he writes. A key event in that breakdown was the bizarrely selective deregulation of the Soviet economy. The officials under Boris Yeltsin who executed this “reform,” for reasons not entirely clear, liberalized the prices of everything but Russia’s natural resources: oil, gas, diamonds and metals. Those lucky enough to get ahold of these commodities at the artificially low, state-mandated prices could turn around and sell them at market rate to the rest of the world. The result was the overnight creation of a generation of Russian oligarchs and “quite simply the grandest larceny in history.”

 

Vast amounts of wealth drained out of Russia and into the pockets of these enterprising, if dodgy businessmen, who in turn deposited the money outside the country in “the biggest single flight of capital the world has ever seen.” Meanwhile, the government in Russia was disintegrating, increasingly unable to provide basic services like security, let alone administer the commercial rule of law required by any market economy. So, you’re a fabulously wealthy oligarch in an ever-more-Hobbesian Moscow: What do you need? Muscle, obviously, and this is where the notorious mafiya, populated by ex-cops and ex-soldiers with nothing constructive to do, became an essential part of the scene. “The police and even the KGB were clueless as to how one might enforce contract law,” Glenny explains. “The protection rackets and mafiosi were not — their central role in the new Russian economy was to ensure that contracts entered into were honored.” Or else.

 

Glenny points out that the Russian mob was not merely a parasite on an otherwise healthy economy, the way the American mafia has been. The mafiya, he insists, was essential to the transition from socialism to capitalism, given that Russia’s Western advisors seemed determined to turn the nation into “a giant petri dish of Chicago-school market economics.” At the same time that the USSR was imploding, the holy doctrine of the free market and minimal government had been enshrined by Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher and their disciples. The West embraced the rampant deregulation of international finance markets — that was the other force behind the rise of global organized crime.

 

Article Continues @ Sourced Site

Heinberg: Resilient communities - paths for powering down:

From Energy Bulletin:

by Mattie Porte

On the last day of the conference, Richard Heinberg was warmly welcomed back for his second presentation.

Last night he gave us ‘Peak Everything: Waking Up to the Century of Declines.’ Now that he’d warmed us up, he said he’d come back to try out some new ideas he’d working with over the past few weeks.

“It’s all a big unknown,” he admitted, but had decided we were the kind of audience that could handle the unknown. Where are we? Where are we going? Richard invited us to journey together with him in this exercise in strategic thinking and see where it would lead. Based on his background, research and experience, Richard has formed 8 assumptions:

Assumptions

1. Global oil production is near its all-time maximum and will begin to decline in the next couple of years, with gas and coal not far behind. The peak discovery was in 1964. The polar regions and the Falklands are now open for exploration. Field sizes are declining — these are flooding environments. Even if there are sizeable oil fields, it will take decades to get them going.

The United States peaked in 1970 after having been the foremost producer and exporter, half of the oil coming from Texas and Oklahoma in the 1930’s and ’40’s. The strategies they applied were:

* More exploration - this led to the discovery of oil in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico which turned the tide temporarily.

* New technologies - water/nitrogen flooding of fields which again helped temporarily, but didn’t change the direction of decline. Technologies do work, Richard says, but only to a certain extent.

In the United Kingdom, the North Sea peaked in 1999 and in the last 8 or 9 years has declined by half. Britain is now a net importer of oil.

Richard’s colleague, Chris Skrebowski, Editor of Petroleum Review, has come up with the best definition Richard has heard of peak oil, that is:

“Global production falls when loss of output from countries in decline exceeds gains in output from those that are expanding.”

From the standpoint of regular crude oils, the world has been producing 74 million barrels a day even as prices exploded through the ceiling at 107 dollars per barrel as of 27 March, 2008.

There is an impact due to our reliance on the export market. The economies of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Russia are expanding and therefore using more energy. That’s where consumption is rising most quickly, along with China. In the case of Russia, its domestic consumption has overtaken most of that increase and the country’s exports are declining now. The picture looks grim because available exports will decline fast and by 2020 - 2025 could disappear.

The British coal industry is virtually gone. The United States has only 250 years of coal left. What is happening to the world’s coal? Estimates are based on reserve to production ratio which assumes that consumption will be static; however, it rises dramatically each year, so the estimates are never accurate and reserves tend to be overestimated anyway. Over the last year, several groups have been looking at global coal supplies and have concluded that global coal production could peak in the next 20 years.

Total energy from fossil fuels will peak out in 2010 and according to Richard, it’s all downhill from here in terms of energy from fossil fuels. This doesn’t mean we’ll see a peak in carbon emissions in 2010 because coal consumption is expanding while oil and natural gas consumption is levelling off and declining.

2. Consequences will be severe. A study was done for the US Department of Energy in 2005 which examined three scenarios based on when work on the problem of peak oil in the world were to start in terms of developing an alternative food, fuel, transport structure, etc. The three scenarios were:

* develop strategies 20 years prior

* develop strategies 10 years prior

* wait until peak oil happens then react.

The Executive Summary of the study report said, ‘The peaking of world oil production presents the world with an unprecedented risk management problem. As peaking is approached, liquid fuel prices and price volatility will increase dramatically and without timely mitigation, the economic, social and political costs will be unprecedented. This will be a bigger problem than either the Great Depression or WWII.’ The word unprecedented was used twice just in the executive summary — something Richard thought might be unprecedented itself for a government executive summary.

Article Continues @ Sourced Site.

*Special Thanks to Relocalize.net and WCPO for this Article.

Peak Oil, Petrodollars, and Climate Change Apathy

From Celsias:

 Peak Oil and a developing trend to switch international oil trading from the weakening U.S. dollar to the Euro (€) may fuel more oil grabs, economic collapse, and further disregard for climate change

 

 World governments, many of whom currently pay lip service to the present and future problems associated with a warming planet, are eager to add to these woes by arguing (and perhaps soon fighting?) over anticipated new oil discoveries as the arctic ice continues to shrink. We know burning fossil fuels causes global warming, but we are tripping over ourselves to find more to burn. This makes it expedient to review some of the factors involved in our continued free-for-all over oil. Some of what follows may surprise.

 

It is now generally accepted that the invasion of Iraq was prompted, not by legitimate concerns about weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), but over a desire to take control over Iraq’s oil reserves (there was never much doubt about this outside of the United States). Iraq holds the second largest proven reserves in the world, next to Saudi Arabia. What is not commonly known, however, is that prior to the Iraqi invasion, Saddam Hussein had already used an economic form of WMD on the U.S., and one that set a precedent the superpower could ill-afford to ignore. Hussein’s action is regarded by some as a primary reason for the Iraqi invasion.

 

Hussein Targets U.S. with Economic ‘WMD’

 

More than two years prior to the U.S. engagement in Iraq, a nation struggling with more than a decade of trade sanctions after its occupation of Kuwait (this occupation also largely centred around oil), Saddam Hussein made what at the time looked like economic suicide by switching from trading oil in dollars, to using the Euro instead. At the time there was no financial gain to be had from the move, in fact quite the opposite. The Euro was at a low ebb — it was purely an act of economic aggression, and one of the only remaining weapons the beleaguered nation could wield against the mighty U.S. of A.

 

From November 2000:

 

Iraq is going ahead with its plans to stop using the U.S. dollar in its oil business in spite of warnings the move makes no financial sense.Baghdad this week insisted on and received UN approval to sell oil through the oil-for-food program for euros only after 6 November. Iraq had threatened to suspend all oil exports — about 5 percent of the world’s total — if the body turned down the request.

 

The move comes despite repeated cautions that Baghdad’s departure from the oil industry standard of the dollar will cost the country millions in currency conversion fees. UN officials have said Iraq will have to reduce the price of its crude oil by about 10 cents a barrel in order to compensate buyers for the additional costs. — RadioFreeEurope 

 

Article Continues @ Sourced Site

U.N. Official Calls for Study Of Neocons’ Role in 9/11

From The New York Sun By ELI LAKEStaff Reporter of the SunApril 10, 2008

 WASHINGTON — A new U.N. Human Rights Council official assigned to monitor Israel is calling for an official commission to study the role neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

 

On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk’s specialty is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the “9-11 official version.”

 

On March 24 in an interview with a radio host and former University of Wisconsin instructor, Kevin Barrett, Mr. Falk said, “It is possibly true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a situation in the country and in the world where something had to happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don’t think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in what really happened than they presently possess.”

 

Mr. Barrett, who is the co-founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth, said in an interview yesterday of Mr. Falk, “I would put him on a list of scholars who are sympathetic to the 9/11 truth movement.”

 

He added, “Unlike most public intellectuals today, he is both honest and very, very knowledgeable in that he understands the probable reality of 9/11. He understands that the evidence that it was a false flag operation is very strong.”

 

The narrative that the attacks from 2001 were a “false flag” operation is a recurring theme in the literature challenging the consensus that 19 Al Qaeda hijackers flew commercial jets into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. False flag refers to espionage or covert actions taken by one government made to seem like the work of another. The false flag thesis has it that the Bush administration is somehow responsible for the September 11 attacks as a pretext for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

 Article Continues @ Sourced Site.

The Alternative Food Network

From Celcias:

 Small scale food retailers, struggling in the UK (and many other countries) by massive monopolising corporations, are beginning to be joined in the battle by alternative food outlets. The fight rages on several fronts.

 

Farmers markets are going from strength to strength in many diverse parts of the UK. Whilst in the recent past these would have been a few overpriced stalls on a wet Wednesday in many towns, some are now fantastically vibrant and even supported and promoted enthusiastically by local authorities.

 

For example, Stroud in Gloucestershire recently won the UK farmer’s market of the year award.

 

The farmers’ market takes over the winding streets of Stroud every Saturday from 9am to 2pm. At its core is the Cornhill Market Place where the market started in July 1999. Steady growth in the number of stalls meant that the farmers’ market has spilled out into surrounding streets making surprises at each turn for the first-time visitor. On average there are 45 stalls attending every week. —farmersmarket.net 

This is particularly encouraging for anyone who remembers the Stroud of 20 years ago — an unremarkable small town in Western England that few bothered to visit. It had many empty shops and an air of boredom. Today the green economy is booming; there are several local alternative currencies and other green initiatives.

 Article Continues @  Sourced Site.




  • Support The H.O.R.N.

    Monthly Subscriptions
    Rock ($10 USD)
    Paper ($25 USD)
    Scissors ($50 USD)
    Hammer! ($100 USD)
  • To donate by mail

On Air!



Streaming and Archives made possible by
The White Rose Society

Chatroom


  • One Billion Bulbs The Head On Radio Network Bulbs Change Statistics

  • H.O.R.N. Widgets




  • Subscribe

    Subscribe to my RSS Feeds

    Categories


    Close