Archive for the 'Corporate Socialism' Category

Echoes of Iraq in Bush handling of mortgage crisis

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Fairly or not, some critics say they can’t help but see similarities between the Bush administration’s hurried approach to the financial market crisis and its headlong plunge into the Iraq war.
“You can draw some valid parallels between the prosecution of the war under the Bush regime and the way the financial sector has operated in recent years,” said Tom Schlesinger, head of the nonprofit research group Financial Markets Center in Howardsville, Va.
“It fails the most basic test of democratic accountability,” Schlesinger said.
On Tuesday, Washington kicks off the first hearings in which top officials will defend their prescription before lawmakers, who also are compelled by circumstances to take speedy action.
Some policy observers point to a “trust us” mentality in the administration’s call to obtain sweeping powers that are scant on checks and balances on the executive branch. In addition, the White House is faulted with a failure to raise alarm before the situation spiraled out of control, forcing the mobilization of more troops and untold financial resources.
Outlining the administration’s remedy, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson came up with a three-page plan to spend $700 billion on toxic mortgage debt that was very spare on key details.
It boils down to “give me the money and trust me,” Schlesinger said.
James Angel, a professor of finance at Georgetown University, said the White House appears to be “flying by the seat of their pants.”

Sidelined

Congress got little advance warning of the proposed bailout, as the Treasury Department waited until five days before lawmakers were set to leave town for the presidential and Congressional election campaigns. As a result, any discussion of alternatives has been sidelined.
In the eight years of the Bush administration, investment firms have, like the security contractor Blackwater, been subjected to slim or no oversight, Schlesinger said. Now comes another big contracting job.
Struggling to assess the cost of a financial rescue, analysts have honed in on the price the Treasury pays for seizing toxic assets on the books of financial institutions. The department has pledged to hire financial market experts to conduct the plan.
Treasury is talking about a plan that essentially would allow sellers to name their price for the securities. Under the plan, a so-called reverse auction, institutions that choose the lowest price — say 50 cents on the dollar — would win instead of a firm that wants 60 cents.

Price too low

Economists said there was a central problem to the Paulson plan. Most of the toxic waste in question does have some price, but it has been too low for the financial institution holding them to accept. So the government buyout would only work if taxpayers overpay for the assets.
“It is no wonder that the Bush administration is pressing to get the plan passed quickly before any real oversight can be brought to bear, because even the simplest due diligence suggests that it needs some work if the taxpayer’s interests are to be even minimally protected and some real oversight brought to bear on the whole process,” wrote Josh Shapiro, chief U.S. economist at MFR Inc. in a note to clients.
And that may be precisely what is most worrisome to economists who fear, as Angel put it, “government bungling that will cost taxpayers, big-time.”

Article Continues @ Sourced Site.

Kucinich: No ‘cash for trash,’

Courtesy Rawstory:

With the White House and Wall Street pressuring Congress to quickly approve a massive taxpayer-funded bailout package this week, several Democrats are coming forward with proposals they say would benefit average Americans alongside financial executives.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) outlined a proposal he said would create “a genuine ownership society,” by giving taxpayers a stake in the companies the government will be saving with its proposed $700 billion package.

“Simply purchasing bad debt, ‘cash for trash’ and not receiving anything of value or giving $700 billion and not having a commensurate equity interest in Wall Street firms is unacceptable,” Kucinich said in a news release Monday. “No ‘cash for trash.’”

The former Democratic presidential candidate said he would be introducing a bill this week to create a “United States Mutual Trust Fund” to convert assets purchased by the governemnt into shares that would be distributed to every man, woman and child in the country. Every American would receive about $2,300 worth of shares because that is the cost of the bailout package to each individual, Kucinich said.

Story Continues with links @ Sourced Site.

Bush plan: $700 Billion for bad mortgages

Courtesy Rawstory

WASHINGTON (AFP) - US Congressional leaders rushed to tackle Saturday an unprecedented 700-billion-dollar plan to rescue the financial sector from the worst crisis since the Great Depression.
President George W. Bush’s administration sent Congress the plan for a 700-billion-dollar bailout of the troubled financial sector over a two-year period, according to a draft of the three-page document posted on The New York Times website.

The plan would give Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson sweeping authority to buy up to 700 billion dollars of tainted mortgage-related assets to stem a grave financial crisis.

“This is a big package because it was a big problem,” Bush told reporters Saturday.

Speaking after his administration sent details of the bailout plan to members of Congress late Friday after a week of crisis in financial markets, Bush said decisive action was needed and that the government would eventually make back the money used for the rescue.

“I will tell our citizens and continue to remind them that the risk of doing nothing far outweighs the risk of the package,” Bush said.

“And that over time, we’re going to get a lot of the money back,” he said.

The president underscored the urgency of the unprecedented bailout, which US officials plan to work on through the weekend.

“But right now, the government needed to send a clear signal that we understood the instability can ripple throughout and affect the working people and the average family and we weren’t going to let that happen,” Bush said.

Article continues @ Sourced Site.

Fed’s $85 Billion Loan Rescues Insurer

Courtesy NYTimes:

WASHINGTON — Fearing a financial crisis worldwide, the Federal Reserve reversed course on Tuesday and agreed to an $85 billion bailout that would give the government control of the troubled insurance giant American International Group.

The decision, only two weeks after the Treasury took over the federally chartered mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is the most radical intervention in private business in the central bank’s history.

With time running out after A.I.G. failed to get a bank loan to avoid bankruptcy, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and the Fed chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, convened a meeting with House and Senate leaders on Capitol Hill about 6:30 p.m. Tuesday to explain the rescue plan. They emerged just after 7:30 p.m. with Mr. Paulson and Mr. Bernanke looking grim, but with top lawmakers initially expressing support for the plan. But the bailout is likely to prove controversial, because it effectively puts taxpayer money at risk while protecting bad investments made by A.I.G. and other institutions it does business with.

What frightened Fed and Treasury officials was not simply the prospect of another giant corporate bankruptcy, but A.I.G.’s role as an enormous provider of esoteric financial insurance contracts to investors who bought complex debt securities. They effectively required A.I.G. to cover losses suffered by the buyers in the event the securities defaulted. It meant A.I.G. was potentially on the hook for billions of dollars’ worth of risky securities that were once considered safe.

If A.I.G. had collapsed — and been unable to pay all of its insurance claims — institutional investors around the world would have been instantly forced to reappraise the value of those securities, and that in turn would have reduced their own capital and the value of their own debt. Small investors, including anyone who owned money market funds with A.I.G. securities, could have been hurt, too. And some insurance policy holders were worried, even though they have some protections.

“It would have been a chain reaction,” said Uwe Reinhardt, a professor of economics at Princeton University. “The spillover effects could have been incredible.”

Financial markets, which on Monday had plunged over worries about A.I.G.’s possible collapse and the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, reacted with relief to the news of the bailout. In anticipation of a deal, stocks rose about 1 percent in the United States on Tuesday. Asian stock markets opened with strong gains on Wednesday morning, but the rally lost steam as worries returned about the extent of harm to the global financial system.

Still, the move will likely start an intense political debate during the presidential election campaign over who is to blame for the financial crisis that prompted the rescue.

Representative Barney Frank, Democrat of Massachusetts and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said Mr. Paulson and Mr. Bernanke had not requested any new legislative authority for the bailout at Tuesday night’s meeting. “The secretary and the chairman of the Fed, two Bush appointees, came down here and said, ‘We’re from the government, we’re here to help them,’ ” Mr. Frank said. “I mean this is one more affirmation that the lack of regulation has caused serious problems. That the private market screwed itself up and they need the government to come help them unscrew it.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi quickly criticized the rescue, calling the $85 billion a “staggering sum.” Ms. Pelosi said the bailout was “just too enormous for the American people to guarantee.” Her comments suggested that the Bush administration and the Fed would face sharp questioning in Congressional hearings. President Bush was briefed earlier in the afternoon.

A major concern is that the A.I.G. rescue won’t be the last. At Tuesday night’s meeting. lawmakers asked if there was any way of knowing if this would be the final major government intervention. Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Paulson said there was not. Indeed, the markets remain worried about the financial condition of major regional banks as well as that of Washington Mutual, the nation’s largest thrift.

Article Continues with Links @ Sourced Site.




  • Support The H.O.R.N.

    Monthly Subscriptions
    Rock ($10 USD)
    Paper ($25 USD)
    Scissors ($50 USD)
    Hammer! ($100 USD)
  • To donate by mail

Streaming and Archives made possible by
The White Rose Society

Chatroom


  • One Billion Bulbs The Head On Radio Network Bulbs Change Statistics

  • H.O.R.N. Widgets




  • Subscribe

    Subscribe to my RSS Feeds

    Categories